Not since My Dinner with Andre can I recall a
film set in a single location - now we have Paolo Genovese's 2017 Italian film The
Place, a cafe by that name in which a distinguished-looking fiftyish
man holds court at a back table. Supplicants come to him with the problems that
most deeply disturb them, and he flips through his thick handwritten notebook
to one of the red ribbons - the kind you’d see in a Bible to mark a verse - and
tells them what act will bring about what they want.
These acts have nothing to do with their problems - a woman
who wants to be prettier is told to steal a very specific amount; a blind man
is told that raping a woman will give him sight. But once he pronounces an
oracular “deal” he has no alternate solution. They are free not to accept it,
or to follow through, but each of them wants their outcome strongly enough to
make their pact - at least to begin with.
They stop by to report on their progress, which he records
in his notebook. The tasks he assigns often overlap, either by his design or by
some hand of providence, and some people get what they ask for, some change
their minds and drop the whole thing, and some try to convince him they did as
he said - but he tells them they didn’t. “How do you know?” A man of few words,
he doesn’t answer, but we know they didn’t. If they had, something about
them would be different.
He is an enigma - we learn the names of some characters, but
even in the credits he is Uomo (the Man). He’s at The Place when they’re
setting up in the morning, he’s there when the waitress is mopping up at night.
As she probes, he admits he doesn’t sleep much. We don’t see him arrive, we
don’t see him leave. Sometimes The Place is crowded, other times he’s the only
customer, and the chairs are upside down on every table except his. Why doesn’t
he get kicked out? What’s his source of funds? He eats and drinks all day, but
we never see him pay.
For a man intent on details, he offers few of his own. His
supplicants ask him questions, including “Who are you?” which he deflects,
returning to why they have come. One character accuses him of being Satan,
which he neither confirms nor denies. He displays a lordly indifference to what
they think of him - his only concern, once he’s assigned their task, is what
steps they’re taking to complete it.
Is his purpose to awaken conscience, or to demonstrate to
people that their desires blot out their morality? Or is he an evil being with
the power to grant people’s wishes - as long as he gets in trade their
compromised integrity? Or is he simply a mirror of a self-absorbed culture in which
our happiness is so important we’re willing to destroy someone else’s to get it?
No comments:
Post a Comment